
From theory to action
This terrain focuses on civic as practical action. Here we examine the practical ways universities can embed civic practices and behaviours.
This section of the Field Guide asks: how can we embed civic practices and behaviours into a university's academic activity and use their 'anchor role' to benefit people and place?
Field Notes at a Glance
Distilled wisdom to guide your path across the terrain.






Foundational Waypoints
By stepping back and seeing evidence in the round, new insights emerge from the clouds.
Think of these waypoints as signposts, not instructions. They capture shared learning and practical insights to help you navigate your civic journey with confidence, at your own pace and from your own place.
Supporting Waypoints
Complementary insights that extend your understanding across the interconnected terrains of civic engagement.
These waypoints offer fresh perspectives to deepen and broaden your civic practice. They're here to complement your journey, giving you the space to explore connections, draw parallels, and engage with ideas that fit your own context.

Coming Soon Download
Take the Civic Field Guide with you!
A downloadable version of the guide is coming soon, designed for you to keep, refer to and share with colleagues.
Whether you're navigating new partnerships or refining existing ones, this portable edition will help you chart your civic journey with ease.
Expedition Debrief
Authentic civic practice emerges when universities systematically embed civic responsibility throughout all institutional practices, ensuring that internal operations genuinely reflect place-based priorities.
This alignment builds essential trust with community partners whilst maximising the civic impact of university resources, operations, procurement policies, employment practices and estates.
Universities can maximise civic impact through practical application of their anchor institution role, strategically using procurement, employment, and facility management to support local economic development, social justice, environmental sustainability, and place-based or regional goals.
This approach positions universities as powerful economic actors whose daily operational decisions can significantly benefit local communities through deliberate alignment of institutional practices with community development priorities, creating authentic demonstration of civic commitment through institutional behaviour.
Universities should develop measurement frameworks that embrace quantitative metrics and qualitative narratives, capturing both numerical progress and powerful community stories that illustrate authentic transformation in people's lives and community capacity.
This mixed-methods approach enables universities to demonstrate their impact rigorously whilst remaining meaningful to community partners, policy makers, and diverse stakeholders. This approach to evaluation embraces the complexity of place-based work and recognises different community contexts.
The Practice terrain emphasises that effective civic working involves connecting internal policy development processes with ongoing external community engagement, ensuring university practices actively contribute to addressing community-identified priorities through systematic dialogue between internal stakeholders and community partners.
This ongoing alignment enables universities to identify opportunities for enhanced community benefit whilst demonstrating genuine civic commitment through daily institutional behaviour.
Essential Equipment
Like a compass and a map, you need the right tools to set you on the right path.
Our essential equipment will help you plan a route and weather any storms along the way.
Civic Impact Dashboard
The Civic Impact Dashboard is a data visualisation tool that helps higher education institutions understand, evidence and benchmark their civic contribution to local places and communities, using integrated official statistics and university data to inform strategy, collaboration and advocacy.
Partners in Practice: Community Toolkit
The ARU Community Toolkit, for the NCIA, offers universities and community organisations practical guidance on building civic partnerships through reverse volunteering. It provides step-by-step tools for project planning, delivery, and impact measurement helping institutions engage meaningfully and sustainably with local communities.
Establishing Civic: Strategy and Practice
This report, drawn from the NCIA Action Learning Programme, provides actionable recommendations to build institutional alignment and maximise civic impact within higher education.
For quantitative evaluation, it outlines how universities can monetise impacts through Gross Value Added (GVA) calculations across nine distinct pillars, from research income and employment to cultural contributions. Critically, it identifies non-monetised civic outcomes including environmental, health, and partnership impacts that reveal the complete story of transformation. The report emphasises embedding impact assessments within university strategy and decision-making, recommending the University Civic Economic Impact ROAMEF cycle to create dynamic, context-specific evaluation. It addresses the tension between rigorous measurement and accessibility to community partners, proposing SMART objectives developed collaboratively with local stakeholders. Read Section 5 to explore the 12 Pillars framework that comprehensively maps both measurable outputs and qualitative civic contributions across different geographic scales.
Rather than prescriptive indicators, it poses contextual questions across seven domains, economic development, civic participation, social development, health and wellbeing, cultural regeneration, environmental stewardship, and governance, recognising that civic looks different in different places.
Read sections on "Economic impacts of university operations" (pages 6-10) to understand how universities can use their purchasing power to support local businesses and employment, creating direct and indirect economic benefits through strategic procurement choices. The section explores university employment practices, including the Living Wage commitment and inclusive recruitment, demonstrating how institutions can model positive change through their role as major employers.
The Partners in Practice Community Toolkit offers universities essential guidance on developing equitable partnerships that ensure institutional practices align with community needs and priorities. This resource emerged from collaborative workshops bringing together civic partners, community organisations, and university staff to explore expectations and experiences of partnership working.
Going Further and Higher presents a compelling vision for how colleges and universities can work together to embed civic responsibility across institutional practice, ensuring educational provision and operations genuinely reflect and respond to local community needs.







